En español
NIDA

Outcomes of Computerized CBT Rival Those of Clinician-Delivered CBT

June 25, 2018
By Eric Sarlin, M.Ed., M.A., NIDA Notes Contributing Writer

This clinical trial:

  • Found that patients who self-administered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) using computerized training modules reduced their drug use as much as patients who received clinician-delivered CBT, and they maintained this advantage through a 6-month follow-up.
  • Suggests that by reducing the time that clinicians need to spend with individual patients, computer-based CBT training may enable treatment programs to accommodate larger caseloads and increase access to treatment.
See text descriptionFigure 1. CBT4CBT Produces Greater Reductions in Drug Use Than Clinician-Delivered CBT or Treatment as Usual Over 12 weeks of treatment, the two groups that received CBT both achieved significantly greater reductions in drug use than did patients who received treatment as usual (weekly group therapy).
Text Description of Graphic

In this NIDA-sponsored trial, patients who were assigned to complete one module of Computer-Based Training for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT4CBT) each week for 12 weeks reduced their drug use by about half over 12 weeks (Figure 1). A comparison group assigned to attend 12 weekly 1-hour CBT sessions with a clinician reduced their drug use by roughly the same amount, while a group assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) (i.e., weekly group therapy) was significantly less successful in reducing use.

See text descriptionFigure 2. CBT4CBT Helps Patients Maintain Lower Drug Use Levels After Treatment Drug use was assessed over 6 months of follow-up after completion of the 12-week treatment. The patients who used CBT4CBT maintained their advantage over those who received treatment as usual, but patients who received clinician-delivered CBT did not.
Text Description of Graphic

The 137 study participants were recruited for the trial when seeking treatment for cocaine, marijuana, opioid, or alcohol uncontrolled use or dependence. Those assigned to CBT4CBT visited the clinic once a week to have their progress monitored, which required about 10 minutes of clinician time. With this minimal clinician input, they provided the most drug-free urine samples (37 percent) of any of the groups during the 12-week trial and maintained their reduced rate of drug use throughout a 6-month post-trial follow-up (see Figure 2).

“CBT4CBT is web-based, so patients can access it whenever and wherever they want,” says Dr. Kathleen Carroll, who developed the program with colleagues at Yale University School of Medicine and led the study. The program’s interactive modules feature graphics, quizzes, and printable practice exercises to teach and model CBT skills, such as coping with drug triggers and managing cravings. “We strove to make the modules engaging and fun,” says Dr. Carroll.

The CBT4CBT group stayed in treatment longer (64 days) than the clinician-delivered CBT and TAU groups in the clinical trial (55 and 43 days, respectively). On before-and-after tests of CBT knowledge that were administered to 50 patients, those in the CBT4CBT group scored greater gains than the other groups.

This study is the first to indicate that CBT4CBT is effective as a standalone treatment for substance use. Several previous studies established the program’s efficacy as an adjunctive treatment to clinician-delivered CBT. In one, Dr. Elise DeVito and colleagues tested CBT4CBT’s effect on how methadone-maintained patients with co-occurring opioid and cocaine use disorders responded to cocaine-associated cues. On a test called a “Drug Stroop Task,” CBT4CBT participants demonstrated greater cognitive control, less attentional bias toward the drug cues, and more engagement in the treatment program than TAU participants.

Dr. Carroll concludes, “CBT4CBT is at least as good as standard outpatient approaches and may be better than some, provided there is adequate clinical monitoring.”

This study was supported by NIH grants DA015969 and DA09241.

Source:

Kiluk, B.D., Nich, C., Buck, M.B., et al. Randomized clinical trial of computerized and clinician-delivered CBT in comparison with standard outpatient treatment for substance use disorders: Primary within-treatment and follow-up outcomes. Am J Psychiatry, 2018 May 24:appiajp201817090978. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17090978. [Epub ahead of print]

Receive articles like this in your inbox monthly!
You will only receive messages related to NIDA Notes

This page was last updated June 2018

NIDA Notes

Tags

Drug Topics

Drugs of Abuse

Population Groups

Related Topics

Get this Publication

    Cite this article

    NIDA. (2018, June 25). Outcomes of Computerized CBT Rival Those of Clinician-Delivered CBT. Retrieved from https://www.drugabuse.gov/news-events/nida-notes/2018/06/outcomes-computerized-cbt-rival-those-clinician-delivered-cbt

    press ctrl+c to copy
    NIDA Notes
    Receive NIDA Notes Articles in your Email!
    You will only receive messages related to NIDA Notes