|

DoubleTree Hotel
Rockville, Maryland
December 3 & 4, 1996
Robert J. Battjes, D.S.W.
Deputy Director
Division of Clinical and Services Research
Lisa S. Onken, Ph.D.
Associate Chief
Treatment Research Branch
Division of Clinical and Services Research
Summary
Meeting Goals:
- Explore recruiting strategies and the process of engagement once clients enter
treatment.
- Stimulate new areas of research in understanding treatment readiness.
- Establish relevance to NIDAs Treatment Initiative, the application of behavior
therapy, and the role of Stage II research.
Meeting Process:
Meeting discussions took place among three important and distinct groups of
researchers representing motivation research, ethnography, and alternative treatments for
hard-to-reach populations. Participants made brief presentations highlighting their
research, and a general discussion led by a facilitator followed.
Content:
Motivation to change includes the following important concepts:
- Readiness and stages of change in treatment indicate that substance abusers may be ready
to initiate, attend, and comply with treatment, but not to change behavior.
- The psycholinguistics of addiction encompass an analysis of verbal commitments in
therapist-client interaction.
- A hierarchy of verbs expresses the degree of client commitment to treatment.
- Analyzing verbal commitments with Motivational Interviewing Techniques can identify
patients who are ready to change.
- Motivation for help-seeking is not the same as motivation for change; readiness to
change is not the same as readiness for treatment.
- Behavioral economics is a theory of motivation for behavior allocation, including drug
use, which provides explanations for behavior choices.
- Treatment readiness is related to client expectations and program goals.
- Avoiding adverse consequences, enhancing self-efficacy, and accepting realistic
normative feedback are predictors of positive outcomes.
Ethnographic Investigation: Drug Abusers Perspectives on Treatment
- Patients frequently fear and distrust methadone treatment.
- Drug abusers view the crack-using lifestyle as more exciting than the perceived boredom
and limited resources of everyday life.
- Rules and regulations of treatment programs need to be modified for low-literacy
patients.
- Treatment programs tend to use rule compliance to determine who is "engaged"
and who is "resistant."
- Cocaine treatment and 3-day detoxification programs are viewed as ineffective by drug
users.
- Roadblocks to treatment include reliance on public transportation that requires a
significant commitment of addicts time and energy.
- Offering help in "managing" a drug habit and then using incentives for broad
behavior change may be constructive steps toward engaging addicts in treatment.
- Addicts use self-management strategies; treatment programs should build on these skills
to help addicts in their recovery.
- Social networks are critical to treatment success.
Alternative Approaches to Drug Abuse Treatment
- Case management is a promising intervention for following homeless HIV-positive drug
abusers.
- Day treatment that includes transportation and meals helps retain clients.
- Comprehensive services such as abstinence-contingent work therapy and housing enhance
treatment.
- Active outreach, reduced waiting time, ancillary services, case management, and
motivational interventions increase treatment entry.
- Cost issues need to be explored; case management is costly, but less so than some
alternatives.
- Coercion takes forms ranging from criminal justice sanctions to family interventions.
Conclusion:
Convergent findings from motivation research, ethnography, and novel treatments
provided valuable treatment readiness information and strategies. Drug treatment may be
viewed as a step toward abstinence; however, addicts do not always use treatment in ways
consistent with the philosophy of treatment providers. Comprehensive, flexible,
multicomponent programs and interdisciplinary research are needed. Dialogue about health
services research needs to continue with NIMH, with CSAT, and within NIDA.
|
|
|